Opening point: This is just a gossip and coincidence.
Huawei ’s 251 employee incident has been buzzing these days. It involves Huawei ’s manpower, legal affairs, and management measures. For a while, Huawei became the target of criticism and the target of Internet users ’crusade. The truth is not yet clear, and by chance, I found a gap that can release my inner gossip impulse.
In the above incident, Li Hongyuan, a former employee of Huawei, worked for Huawei for 12 years. When the contract expired, Huawei chose not to renew his contract. According to his recent interview with the media, “On January 31, 2018, , Mr. He of the HR of the network energy product line talked to me, and the plan given was N + 1 (including the year-end award). I did not agree with this plan and proposed 2N. In the end, they readily agreed and the two sides signed a resignation. Agreement. The negotiation process lasted for two hours. There were jokes and jokes in the middle. I didn’t have any words of extortion and mention the things reported before. “
2N was taken from a private account, so there was a tragedy of Li Hongyuan being held for 251 days.
The key message here is that Huawei will buy out the employee’s working life every eight years. Weibo user “Huawei HR” In Weibo on December 2nd:
Huawei employee turnover management:
1. Huawei employees leave, Huawei has never blocked employees from leaving and free to come and go; no matter whether you voluntarily leave or renew your contract, Huawei will give N + 1 monthly salary subsidy, which is unique among domestic companies. !! Extremely kind, no one.
2. Huawei will buy out the working age and re-enter the job approximately every 8 years. The subsidy is 8 + 1. Employees are very welcome.
According to his analysis, “Lee, he has not renewed his contract when it expires in 12 years, and he also said that HR informed him in advance that he would not renew his contract. According to the labor law, he can get N monthly wage compensation, this N It is 4, because he has already obtained it once in 8 years, Huawei gives N + 1 completely legal. However, Li took 2N, why do others give him more? “
As said before, we will not discuss right and wrong in this article. This is a judge.Duties.
But the “Huawei buyout years” mentioned in it did indeed cause uproar. On New Year’s Day (January 1st), 2008, the new “Labor Contract Law” was officially implemented, and Huawei internally adopted a plan in September 2007, saying that all Huawei employees, including Ren Zhengfei, who have worked for eight years in Before New Year’s Day in 2008, you must go through the procedures of voluntary resignation (that is, “actively resign”, then “compete for employment”), and then sign a labor contract with the company for 1-3 years; abolish the current job number system, and Reordering; all employees who voluntarily leave will receive Huawei’s corresponding compensation, and the compensation plan is “N + 1” mode. “Huawei former HR” mentioned in Weibo that “in the past, public opinion said that employees were scolded by the media for being too far away and afraid of being affected by pornographic influence to receive money.”
In order to go back in time, I went back and forth to those big and small reports 10 years ago. It turned out that such an article was accidentally found-on July 22, 2008, the Evening News reported this incident:
![]()
Gossip is out. There is nothing wrong with this report. It is a normal report—although it has not changed Huawei ’s human policy. The gossip point is that the author of this report, Xu Jieyun, was the current director of Xiaomi Public Relations. The subtle relationship between Huawei and Xiaomi is another story.
This is a coincidence across time. You know, when Xu Jieyun wrote this report, Xiaomi was not born, and Lei Jun had not formally said goodbye to Jinshan.
This coincidence of taste that condition:
1. Many public relations (directors) of Internet companies now come from the media. They are often well-known journalists of the past, and even have some classic works. In addition to Xu Jieyun mentioned in this article, for example, now in Xiaohongshu, the previous one Xu Lei, who was standing in Ali for public relations, was the author of Ten Dog Day’s Ten Years ago. The reports and judgments written by journalists with a social and public perspective, compared with the companies, interests, and positions they serve in the future, seem to have some wonderful effects, sometimes overlapping and consistent, sometimes disagreeing and different. wrongBit.
This can only make people lament the ups and downs of industrial competition, and the circle is a bit small.
But no matter what, we should still thank those former journalists for their conscience and hard work, and pay tribute to the classic reports in history.
Second, the 251 incident is Huawei’s human policy and culture. After the incident ten years ago, it was once again scrutinized and questioned by the people. The objects questioned by the media ten years ago (that is, Huawei’s approach and philosophy) have been particularly so far.
Put aside the right and wrong of this 251, and do not investigate the hidden affair. It can be confirmed that Huawei has always pursued a highly utilitarian, “severe punishment” human policy and corporate culture. This kind of highly utilitarian, said that the good point is “struggle-oriented”, and the subtext is “People who do not want to struggle, or even struggle for various subjective and objective reasons, should never be abandoned.” You know, will such a highly utilitarian manpower concept continue to accompany this first-class Chinese company to the next decade? Can it hold up its next decade?