MCN is fast to update and the investment logic behind it is constantly changing.

Editor’s note: This article comes from WeChat public account “Chocolate entertainment investment” (ID: ylwanjia) < / a>, the author Blue Lotus. Reprinted with permission.

Recently, the third-party data company Xiaohulu announced the ranking of MCN commercial valuation in November this year. Among them, Gumai Jiahe ranked first with a valuation of 35.48 million and Wuyou Media ranked second with a valuation of 31.77 million Vision Entertainment ranked third with a valuation of 30.14 million …

However, the valuation calculation method of this list is mainly the sum of KOL’s contribution to MCN institutions. The evaluation criteria include multiple dimensions such as monthly sales, order price, number of popular videos, and fan growth, rather than investment. Institutional real gold and silver investment valuation.

Investors say that 99% of MCN institutions are not worth investing

Since 2016, MCN institutions have successively received financing. Earlier financing cases such as Alibaba’s investment in new studios. Since then, various institutions have been looking at investment opportunities in the MCN field. For example, Sequoia Capital has invested in Erca Media, Huaying Capital and Qianhai Fund have invested in Quick Beauty, Chenhai Capital and Mango Culture have invested in Micron Technology.

But these investment cases are more like sporadic layouts rather than systematic investments, and the logic is different. Some follow young content logic, some follow consumer logic, and some follow marketing logic.

If you pay attention to Douyin’s monthly release of the top 30 MCN institutions in the composite index, you will find that the top MCN institutions such as Gumai Jiahe, Vision Entertainment, OST Entertainment, Lu Changwan and Wuyou Media have never raised funds.

Investors say that 99% of MCN institutions are not worth investing

On the one hand, there is still a lot of controversy about whether MCN institutions have investment value in the investment community; on the other hand, MCN generally has good cash flow, so the willingness to equity financing is not great.

In 2019, several MCN institutions have received financing, and investors continue to watch, but the requirements are relatively high. So what does a truly valuable MCN look like? What happened to the logic of investing in them?

MCN is a good business, but the ceiling is obvious

According to a data released by the Institute of Big Data, the number of MCN institutions in China has exceeded 6,500 by the end of June 2019.

At the MCN forum at the CEIS2020 opportunity venue hosted by Entertainment Capital, just now, the host asked Zhuang Jun, the cooperation leader of the watermelon video agency of the platform. I feel that MCN is already a red sea. If I do it now, is there any chance? ?

Zhuang Jun replied that the opportunity has always been. “MCN in Youtube form existed three or four years ago. There are still many people this year. This year, the MCN field has just begun.”

Investors say that 99% of MCN institutions are not worth investing

This has a lot to do with the platform’s policies. The platform has been supporting new content organizations to take the lead and continue to introduce new ones. The platform also adjusted the live broadcast policy, lowered the threshold of guilds, so that all guilds had the opportunity to fight for high scores. This is considered to be a major benefit to small and medium sized associations.

In general, the prosperity of a field will attract a large number of capital to follow up. However, in the face of the hot field of MCN, the attitude of capital does look more and invest less, and many investors believe that the value of MCN investment is not high.

In the chat with multiple investors, they have the following firm attitude from time to time:

“Not worth investing”, “I haven’t watched”, “I haven’t seen a very valuable company”, “I have seen a lot and haven’t voted” “Because of the MCN company, I have run less in Beijing this year, mainly to go Some of the following prefecture-level cities have explored the supply chain. “I always wanted to lay out and didn’t see the right one.” “MCN is a good business, but the ceiling is obvious.” “It’s just a business. It can’t be copied. It can’t be scaled up. Legal listing. “…

A Shanghai-based investor who invested in top-ranked anchor institutions said that MCN institutions are not good at investing, and Internet investment is mainly invested in dividends, but from the Weibo era to the WeChat era to the Douyin Kuaishou era, the content platform is changing The faster the network dividend is gradually equalized.

“The greatest investment value of a dividend is that only a few people seize it. When everyone knows that this is a dividend and wants to seize it, and they all know how to operate, he is not reallyDividends. “

The greater concern for more investors is that they are not optimistic about the business model of copying the head KOL.

From 2017, Sheng Di Jiacheng’s managing director Liu Di began to look at MCN institutions. At that time, Uncle He Xian, an early MCN institution, had just been invested by Sina, but Liu Di also never shot.

“I mainly think that there is no way for the reds to copy in batches. The appearance of a head online celebrity must be in harmony with the times. The problem that traditional brokerage companies cannot solve is also the same for MCN. This is why we did not invest MCN agency. “

Ruhan once wanted to copy Zhang Dayi, but failed. Mei ONE tried to copy Li Jiaqi, too. In the end, both of the head anchors became shareholders of the company. Li Jiaqi once joked during his speech: “The beauty ONE has not been copied for a long time.”

Investors say that 99% of MCN institutions are not worth investing

The relationship between the head KOL and MCN is similar to the relationship between a celebrity and an artist agency. In fact, it is not very stable. It is not uncommon for artists to be solo after being strong.

MCN organization Gomei only makes mid-waist influencers, not hatching head influencers. The founder of the company, Nan Ya, joked that unless the head KOL is his wife, he will not train the head anchor, because it will form a huge backlash on the company.

Zheng Peimin, the founder of Rongzheng Capital, has always wanted to make a layout, but did not suffer from not having a suitable target.

“MCN institutions are very difficult to invest. Just like a drama company, 99% is not worth investing. If Happy Twist only has one star, then the company is worthless; to be able to replicate the star, in extreme cases, the head If the celebrity is canceled, then the company is still valuable. This is a valuable entertainment company. By analogy, MCNs with similar organization and brand value have the meaning of capital investment. “

Investors who have invested in MCN institutions have their own logic, and there are no institutions that do so, and they also have their own reasons.

“The main thing is that there is no way to withdraw. Investment does not exit. All are hooligans.” An investor joked that Ruhan was the only listed company in this field, but it broke first, and then the stock price did not reach the issue. price. “

MCN is relatively fast, it is scattered, fragmented, there is no way to form a large concentration, and it has the characteristics of content organization. This MCN institution may be very popular in two years, but can it be a 5 or even 10-year business and can it help investors achieve 10Times, or even higher returns, this is a question mark.

MCN institutions are not short of money, and they want to use debt financing

Capitals despise MCN institutions, and MCN institutions also do not need equity financing. This is why the industry has not experienced a capital boom.

Since 2016, MCN institutions have also undergone some changes, becoming more comprehensive, and more profitable and risk-resistant. For example, those who are influential incubators start to move closer to the upstream and control their own goods; while companies in the supply chain want to incubate influentials themselves.

The platform is also actively promoting the diversified development of MCN institutions. Short videos and live broadcasts are inseparable, and Douyin is now actively embracing e-commerce.

Observing the monthly rankings of Douyin, we can see that the top MCN organizations on the Douyin list are all unions that used to broadcast live. From a horizontal perspective, MCN institutions have become more and more integrated with short videos, shows, e-commerce live broadcasts, and more diversified development.

Investors say that 99% of MCN institutions are not worth investing

Take the rigorous anchor of Vision Entertainment as an example. Its current fans on the Douyin platform have exceeded 7 million, the monthly live stream has reached more than 3 million, the monthly star map has more than 2 million, and the e-commerce monthly sales The volume exceeded one million and the annual sales reached more than 70 million.

The compound development of KOL determines the compound development pursuit of MCN institutions. In this way, the flow of each MCN institution is very good.

MCN’s most local business was advertising, with sufficient cash flow. Once the business is broadcast live on the compound, the head anchor seizes the rising dividend of Douyin Live, and lays directly to make money. In other words, even if these MCN institutions do not raise funds, they still live very moisturized.

A friend of reporters in the field of e-commerce was invited to a private gathering of the founders of the live broadcast union and the MCN agency. According to him, being in it feels a strong local tyrant. One of the details is a dinner The cigars are moved one box at a time, not to mention the red wine and Jane.

Until the middle of this year, Vision Entertainment is still recruiting at a rate of 6,000 anchors per month, and the speed will continue to increase. Xiao Yu once asked Chen Pengbo, at what time do you think your recruitment of anchors will slow down, he replied that when the company’s monthly turnover exceeds 200 million.

Due to the continued rapid expansion of the scale of Internet celebrities, the flow of Vision Entertainment is also growing at a rate of 20% -30% per month. “AprilOne is the content value of MCN. If the MCN organization can produce high-quality content, it is valuable. The other is that if the quality of the content is not refined, it depends on the number of his accounts, which is the value of quantity, and it has certain marketing. value.

These two logics are exactly the changes in investment logic in the MCN field since 2016.

“In the beginning, investing in MCN was based on the logic of the celebrity. Now we invest in MCN as a marketing tool. For MCN, it is mainly the front-end celebrity traffic and the back-end goods. If you cannot control the traffic , Then control the supply chain of goods. Therefore, MCN institutions with a supply chain can take a look. “Liu Di said.

In Liu Di ’s view, if the organization that integrates live broadcast with MCN is better, they value the organization ’s delivery and marketing capabilities more. Many traditional source companies on the front end very much hope that the new media organizations can help them realize online sales, and only the MCN company at the head cannot take over. There must be a MCN organization at the waist to make this money.

Investors say 99% of MCN institutions are not worth investing

This kind of ending will become, some MCN operating agencies cooperate with the supply chain to form a joint venture company, holding the traditional upstream supply chain products to make their own brand.

It’s equivalent to an online celebrity company cut into the consumer field, and finally it is the logic of the brand. But as a brand, no company understands it better than a marketing company. “So, I want to find an MCN company with a marketing gene.”

In fact, many e-commerce live broadcast MCNs are transitioning to brands. Not long ago, Li Jiaqi also mentioned in a public speech that he would also set up his own brand in the future, and ONE is no longer an MCN company, but an IP commercial company.

Taobao Broadcasting another head MCN agency Gomei is also taking a similar path. Establish a brand company on top of MCN, and use its multiple MCN agencies as sales channels to sell its own brand products, thereby overcoming large fluctuations in MCN revenue.

Earlier, Mango Culture and Investment invested in two MCN institutions, one is entertainment plus entertainment, and the other is Weinian (the company where Li Zizhen is).

“MCN has a good cash flow, similar to the film and television industry. We need to see if it has the ability to continuously produce explosive models, and its comprehensive strength can extend the life cycle of the Internet celebrity, and ensure continuous improvement Content output, maintain a certain influence and carry out traffic conversion and monetization. Generally speaking, the volatility and randomness are still very strong. “Cui Weibiao, executive director of Mango Culture and InnovationShow.

Cui Wei believes that there are not many mcn companies worth investing in the market. If you look at it, “Must be a company that can demonstrate platformization and continuous production capacity. There are some successful cases in the past, vertical sustainable development, horizontal Can be done at scale. “

Investors from the aforementioned Shanghai investment institutions said that instead of investing in a company that transitions from anchor MCN to a brand, it is better to invest in a brand company that understands Internet operations and has a sense of network, using MCN as a sales channel. Perfect Diary and other brands.

“The celebrities have a longer and more difficult process of controlling the cargo side, but the brand originally needed to control the channel. Now it is just an additional MCN channel based on the original, which is more logical. “

MCN is fast to update and the investment logic behind it is constantly changing. As a friend joked, there are no video download thresholds in the 5G era. Who knows what will happen to short videos in the future?