On the evening of August 22, the Institute of Atmospheric Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences released on its official microblog the statement on the misinterpretation of research conclusions by microblogs. It said that the academic paper entitled “emergent constraints on future projects of the western North Pacific subtropical high” published by the scholars of the Institute in nature communication in 2020 focused on the extremely high temperature chamber gas emission scenario (rcp8.5). By 2100, Possible variations of the subtropical high over the Northwest Pacific. The work of this paper has no connection with the occurrence and prediction of the recent extreme high temperature events< Br > < div class = "height" > < / div > according to the Institute of Atmospheric Physics, in order to predict the long-term climate change at the end of this century, the climate model must be used. However, due to the influence of the level of scientific and technological development, the current model results are still uncertain. In terms of climate prediction, it is reflected that different models have different responses to the same greenhouse gas forcing. For example, the prediction results of 35 climate models participating in the “Fifth International coupled model comparison program” (cmip5) on the subtropical high in the Northwest Pacific are very different from each other. In order to reduce this uncertainty and give more accurate long-term change prediction results, this paper adopts a method called “emergent constraint” in the world. Its basic principle is to correct the deviation of the original prediction results of the climate model based on the reliable physical relationship between the current climate state and the future state by using the current abundant observation data< Br > < div class = "height" > < / div > “to sum up, this paper does not involve the temperature prediction in the next 10 years, nor does it put forward or support the conclusion that ‘this year is the coolest year in the next 10 years’. The reference to Weibo is a distortion of the original meaning of the paper, which is hereby explained.”< img alt="" style="width:600px;" src=" https://imagecloud.thepaper.cn/thepaper/image/212/161/355.jpeg ">