This article is from the public number:Guangming (ID:gmw_001) author: Guangming commentator, drawing from the title: Oriental IC

In 2017, Yuzhang Academy, which was exposed to corporal punishment and other issues, was officially closed. However, in the past two years, the “sequel” caused by this institution has continued. According to the newsReports, after leaving the academy, some people got rid of the shadows, some people were away from the family, school, some people fell into depression, became numb, and even tried to commit suicide or crime. Volunteers who have reported to Yuzhang College have recently been threatened with death.

There is no such thing. The Southwind window recently reported a problematic juvenile correctional institution called “Chengdu Carnival Youth Psychological Counseling Center”: here students are students, and teenagers are persecuted by the problem teenagers. Carnival is a hierarchical and alienated human correction system – extreme physical fitness, corporal punishment, violence; flattering, reporting; “the more obedient, the more powerful”; students can come up with a variety of escape modes, some people drink iodophor Suicide, some people take bricks and force each other. Some people planned to go to the kitchen to take a kitchen knife and take the hostages to escape, but they were told by their own people that they were beaten and shouted…

For the behavior of the two institutions, how to determine the locality still needs final confirmation of the judiciary, but from the beginning of the media and the description of the students, the Yuzhang Academy and the horror “carnival” that were exposed to physical punishment are actually similar. They all self-proclaimed to help parents “save children”, and some parents are convinced that they will send their children into “forging” after paying low tuition fees.

The results can be imagined. After many large and small “Yuzhang Academy” in these years, they should let the society have a clearer understanding of the truth of such structures. > There is no “education” here, only “anti-education”. If there is “healing”, then it must be “destroyed” more.

From the Yuzhang Academy in Nanchang, Jiangxi to the Carnival in Chengdu, Sichuan, the society is reminded that their demise is not so easy. For a traumatized child, you can’t just stop being rescued from the institution. After the institution is closed, how can these children return to normal life, in addition to the reflection and efforts of parents, public services or social welfare organizations need to provide targeted assistance. In addition, after the suspension of the Yuzhang Academy, the Carnival was still open for more than a year, and reported that it is likely to “reopen” in a few months. Does this mean that there is still a lack of normality in the regulation of such institutions?

There is a detail in the media coverage that is intriguing. Students who come out of the carnival report to the local authorities that the institution is illegal. However, the local public security organ responded in June this year: “After visiting, the company has not found any violent violence and violence that corporal punishment, ill-treatment and illegal restrictions on the freedom of minors.” Until the local petition office reported its registration information is ” The fitness service company, rather than the educational institution, was only operating in violation of regulations, and did not have the qualification to run a school. The local education department ordered the school to stop.

Of course, it cannot be concluded that there must be some flaws in the investigation conclusions of the initial local public security organs.However, the fitness service company has a bright education, and it is reflected in the negligence and passiveness of supervision when the reporters break through.

There are repeated exposures of relevant cases, whether there is a mature gray industrial chain behind it, and it is urgent to conduct authoritative investigations. In the face of repeated chaos, the local regulatory authorities should not be indifferent. For similar suspicious institutions, there should be a three-footed regulatory intervention. In any case, the “discipline” behavior directly facing people, especially children, must be subject to strict supervision and legal review.

Just a few days ago, the Ministry of Education issued a draft for the implementation of educational disciplinary rules for primary and secondary school teachers, and detailed provisions on the boundaries of teacher education disciplinary power. To a certain extent, this also represents the consensus of the society on the scale of child discipline.

Obviously, those scenes that have occurred in informal institutions have greatly broken this consensus. To thoroughly regulate this kind of extra-legal and consensus-based gray discipline education business, we should start from effectively cleaning up the “Yuzhang Academy” and “Carnival” who are still operating.

This article is from the public number: Bright Web (ID: gmw_001) , author: bright network commentator