g/interlace/1/q/85″ data-w=”1000″ data-h=”563″>
But in fact, if this approach is feasible, then why do we still spend so much money to negotiate with customers, through this kind of relationship between people at the negotiating table to establish trust and finally achieve Get this contract. So from this perspective, perhaps the most important thing for your children is that you can really go home and have a look instead of sending WeChat to your parents.
Expanding a bit more, is the matter of conversation. Peter Senge, a popular figure in management, talks about how to build a learning enterprise in his book “The Fifth Practice”. Peter Senge himself admires a person very much, even saying that he is his spiritual leader, David Bohm.
Who is David Bohm? He is a quantum physicist who participated in the Manhattan Project and later returned to England after being persecuted by McKinsey Doctrine. When he was old, he admired the Dialogue process very much, because the CC forum itself requires not to use too much English, so I translated the word Dialogue into a big chatter.
He said that scientific research is just a chattering process. All scientists through different research backgrounds, then meet together, chat, email, and post articles to communicate as much as possible. In the process, they generate new ideas and give new solutions. In addition, scientists themselves are chattering with their own historical experience, then draw new conclusions and develop and perfect their own theories. From this perspective, scientific research may be a probable process.
Newtonian mechanics says that things with small probability must have small effects, but scientific research is obviously not a small probability. Even if it is a small probability, its impact is obviously not a small probability. So from this point of view, can we expand to scientific research itself, through the chatter, expand more information in the back, and include this information, then scientific researchHas it become an inevitable process in itself, rather than a probable process?
We talk about the traditional model that always constructs a hierarchical structure during the operation of an enterprise. It is the leader of an enterprise that he is sending out homework, telling each department in the enterprise what work to accomplish. We have an assumption here, that is, if each department can successfully complete its work, then the enterprise can operate efficiently.
In fact, we found that with the emergence of learning companies, especially now the emergence of knowledge-based companies, the emergence of companies like GOOGLE, Apple and even the WhatsApp two days ago, corporate management has become more and more complicated In fact, more cost has become the communication between departments of the enterprise. You will find that after each department has completed its work perfectly, when the leader takes back the work, it is completely impossible to put it together.
That’s why Peter Senge told David Bohm that he would use a chattering method to solve the problems between departments and departments within the company, bringing all the employees of the company together and letting them chat. There is no pressure, no background or even There is no purpose to communicate together, then at this time you will find that it becomes a very effective means to make the enterprise a very effective operation team. It even means that we can recall that many new ideas and even new views of the company were produced in the course of these rants.
For business leaders, if there is a tool like chatter, you can actually do very little.
Look at this short video, which is in sharp contrast with the photo before us.
In fact, for a business leader, when the rules are established, the inside of the business is like traffic rules. Each driver’s brain itself is a complex system. When they build a complex network, each Nodes will complete their own corresponding work and find their own position, then the entire system willOperate in an effective environment.
It is similar to managing an enterprise. For the managers of your company, you may only need to allow these people to communicate effectively, and even believe that every employee in your company is a knowledge-based enterprise worker. The organizational behavior of this method is from the perspective of quantum mechanics. , It is called the spontaneous breaking of symmetry, or the self-organizing behavior of the complex system of the enterprise.
Summarize the ten minutes of content I just said, the information that needs to be brought home: We compared the difference between classical mechanics and quantum mechanics. Classical mechanics tells us that the world we live in is an objective and real world. , But the development of quantum mechanics over the years may have some influence on these things and our classical vision.
Speaking from the classics, we can understand a thing through analysis and synthesis, but quantum mechanics tells you that you can’t separate the thing we live in. The process of dividing you has changed the thing itself. And quantum mechanics itself may not tell you that this world is objective.
When you are observing, you change the thing itself, and at the same time the thing itself changes you. The observer and the observed are entangled. From the perspective of reality, we talked about quantum information earlier. Quantum information itself can move faster than light, so from a physical point of view, it no longer recognizes the objective reality stipulated by the special theory of relativity.
Then what you can learn can probably be summed up in at least two sentences: One sentence means that we are now living in the 21st century, can we still see the world around us from the perspective of the 18th century; another sentence In other words, we once believed that in the big data world of 01 code, our economy can take off, and we can use these concepts of 01 big data to change our lives. From the perspective of quantum mechanics, it provides There are some information that may not be included in the classic information. How can I deal with this information? And is this information closer to our lives?
This article comes fromWeChat public account: CC Forum (ID: ccjt2014), Speaker: Ma Zhaoyuan