Content/201910/22/212129595036.jpg?imageView2/2/w/1000/format/jpg/interlace/1/q/85″ data-w=”358″ data-h=”318″>

Two days later, the platform replied:

“Hello, your appeal review failed, the appeal failed. Please carefully follow the “WeChat public platform operating specifications” to jointly create a good operating environment.”

I still haven’t told me what the specific articles and actions are being accused.

What a shocking punishment process. I think you are guilty, but I don’t tell you exactly what time and place to do something wrong, but I am sorry that I need to punish you.

With the traffic of my small account, the revenue of the bottom ad slot is indeed negligible, and the impact is not significant. But from the personality is too embarrassing, my contemporary glass heart can get this.

I found the relevant auditors and finally got to know the problem. It’s really dumbfounding.

In the comment section of “I am just a capitalist who wants to make money,” one reader said:

The article “Special National Conditions and the Curtain of Ignorance” forgot to open originals and appreciation, so some readers in the comment area said:

These two comments—though not appearing in the body, even though they are all readers’ messages—are judged to be account violations: induced click ads.  

* * *

The author is judged against the content appearing in the comment area, and the rationality will be discussed later. But this reminds me of another similar thing.

At the beginning of last year, Weibo launched the “Comment Management” function. This function is simply described. You can choose not to manage the rights, which is managed by the platform. However, if you open this function, the comments you choose to display will also be As part of your presentation, you are responsible for it.

The scope of speech expression is certainly not just “speech.” Many times, through selection, people are also expressing their opinions and expressing their positions.

The author can choose to show and not show any comments – Weibo provides this right, and bloggers can choose not to have this right. When there is no right to choose, each person’s speech represents each person’s opinion. The content of the comment is in principle independent of the blogger; when possessing such rights, the process and result of the selection are counted as part of the “expression.”

Although this definition of the scope of freedom of speech is actually used to suppress freedom of speech – through the joint responsibility of comment management, bloggers will be more rigorous in self-censorship and review review – but from In theory, Weibo’s policy is reasonable.

However, WeChat’s comment management is the default. All accounts have comment screening rights; so in theory, accounts should also be responsible for their comments. Even commentsI only mentioned myself and did not induce others, but it seems to be reluctant to judge the “induction” of the author.

But the problem is that not all authors actually “actually” enjoy the right to comment management.

Because you can’t choose to abandon the comment management, in order to maximize the diversity of the comment area, like most other bloggers, I will release all comments directly most of the time (unless the number is full) to manually shape a public discussion space.

If the author manually abandons the comment management and displays all the comments, it is still a reasonable judgment to use the comment area content to “sit” the author.

I don’t think it is reasonable.

It’s just that this “irrationality” is meaningless. We are not discussing this issue in an environment where we can discuss the rationality of speech responsibility. The real answer may be simpler:

Because many articles disappeared because of the comment area, many accounts were bombed because of the comment area. Even we can speculate that the reason why WeChat public account can’t provide the function of “no comment is all released” is not to provide, but not to provide.

Because a more reasonable speculation is that a social platform like Weibo, if born today, has no chance of a big chance to go online. The most stringent Douban of the Internet self-censorship in China has just been released from the confinement.

Is this a reasonable judgment? When asked here, we can’t ask down.

But in any case, WeChat ads determine that I am inducing readers to advertise a certainty. I am too embarrassed.

Friends, don’t advertise, really don’t.

It’s good to reward.

This article is from WeChat public account:Wandering (dada_molly)