From the legal resignation, the parties were detained for 251 days, which caused a sense of insecurity in the workplace.
Huawei’s former employee Li Hongyuan’s 251 incident was full of excitement. Since the development of the situation, there have been many disputes between right and wrong. The judiciary has acquitted the former Huawei employee and paid national compensation. The public opinion field has made various voices. Employees are sympathetic. Li Hongyuan also spoke through the media and introduced the events and personal attitude.
Everyone is waiting for Huawei’s response and processing results.
Tonight, Huawei finally responded: Huawei has the right and the obligation, and reports the suspected illegal act to the judicial authorities based on the facts. We respect the decisions of the judiciary, including public security, prosecutors’ offices and courts. If Li Hongyuan thinks his rights have been damaged, we support him to use legal weapons to defend his rights, including suing Huawei. This also reflects the spirit of the rule of law in which everyone is equal before the law.
From Huawei ’s response, Huawei does not consider that the ex-employee ’s detention for 251 days is directly related to it, and during the entire incident, Huawei at least from the level of corporate behavior Nothing does not comply with the law. Therefore, although Huawei was on the cusp of this incident, it did not make an apology to Li Hongyuan.
However, Huawei ’s response is still very thin and not enough to respond to many doubts in the incident, for example, what was the cause of the lawsuit against the employee; and HR, who negotiated with him about the termination compensation, and why When investigating the inspection agency, first said that the two sides had been threatened by Li Hongyuan during the negotiation and later withdrew their confession; why did Huawei use the private account instead of the company account when transferring the employee? What will happen to Huawei’s employees involved in this matter? Does the Huawei party exist? Reporting false cases, giving false evidence, and falsely accusing employees of framing, etc. Huawei needs to answer these questions.
However, Li Hongyuan also suffered many questions. The core problem is that according to Huawei’s practice, in this case, Huawei’s compensation to the quitting employee is N + 1 month salary (N is the length of service), but Huawei will give him 2N compensation. What’s the hidden reason?
At present, there are still many doubts and blind spots in this matter. Comprehensive online information, and Li Hongyuan ’s statement through the media, the incident roughly goes as follows:
Li Hongyuan joined Huawei in 2005 and left in January 2018. According to Li Hongyuan, he once reported that the business of his department was fraudulent, and was subsequently targeted by the supervisor in the department. Huawei did not renew the contract after the contract expired. According to the law, if the employee agrees to renew the contract, the company needs to renew the contract. Employees make compensation. However, in terms of compensation, the two sides have diverged. The proposal given by Huawei HR He Mou is N + 1 (including the year-end award). Li Hongyuan disagreed and proposed a 2N request. Huawei agreed and the two parties signed a termination agreement. But on December 16, Li Hongyuan was criminally detained by Shenzhen Public Security Bureau on suspicion of extortion and arrested on January 22, 2019. However, due to “unclear criminal facts and insufficient evidence”, Li Hongyuan was released on August 23, 2019, and was detained for a total of 251 days.
This matter has received much attention after being exposed. 251 is popular on the Internet. “Leaving 251” has become a sad word in the workplace like “overtime 996”. At present, both sides are right or wrong, and more evidence is yet to be disclosed.
However, this incident detonated the network and had a far greater impact than the usual incident of leaving employees. In the final analysis, The legal termination of the legal process, the client was detained for 251 days For a long time, it caused a sense of insecurity in the workplace.
Further reading: Dialogue with Huawei detained 251 days ago Employees: Not actively exposed, I hope to communicate with Huawei