This article comes from WeChat public account: caoz’s nightmare (ID: caozsay) , author: caozsay

We often say online, do n’t double-bid.

But it’s not absolute. Actually, I can double-mark myself.

For example, in terms of tourism, I travel to Taiwan, Japan, or hang out on the streets of Singapore. My wallet is in my pants pocket. The wallet is large and the pants pocket is small. It doesn’t matter if I show half of it.

But when I go to Europe, especially France, Italy, Spain, I will definitely put my wallet in the inner pocket of my jacket. It turns out that this decision made me avoid major losses.

Another example is when I drive in Singapore, I put the briefcase in the co-driver and the back seat. I get off the car to do things, and the bag stays in the car. It doesn’t matter. Self-driving in the United States, from the car rental counter to local friends, reminds you repeatedly that valuables should be carried with you. Do not stay in the car. This advice must be listened to.

Social security levels vary widely in different countries and regions. If you copy a standard, it is silly.

A similar situation exists in the workplace and in interpersonal communication.

You are a technology manager in a large company. You have your own test and interview standards for operation and maintenance solutions. One day you went to a startup company. The resources are different, the brand and influence are different. The company is in The competitive environment is also different.

That’s the first one. The so-called standards are tailored to local conditions and seek truth from facts. Don’t copy the environment without looking at the customer. What works in some places may not work in other places. Some environments are usable, others may not be usable.

So let’s say one more thing. As a self-media, many people know that it is annoying to wash manuscripts. The oldest article I have visited the most is not me.The public account number was sent by others who copied my different articles after splicing. Then do you say I report it, plagiarize the source and source without plagiarism, I will report it, identify the author ’s source, and only borrow For some of the subject matter, most of the content has nothing to do with me, and some readers will complain. Then the report information will be transferred to me. I ’ll take a look, even if I ’m too lazy to report it, I will directly cancel it.

My scale is relatively loose, frankly, because I don’t have to rely on codewords to eat.

But some authors will be tighter, they will not tolerate the manuscripts of others, and they are very disgusted with unauthorized citations. In this case, do you say I support it? I support their rights. I can understand the anger of the original authors, and I support this behavior to protect my legitimate rights and interests.

Some people are very gangsters from the media. What ’s wrong with manuscript washing? Everyone does it. You can do it if you have the ability. I do n’t report others washing my manuscript. Why do you report me? This standard seems to be the same as you, but it is actually a hooligan. Of course, there are more gangsters. Of course, others who wash themselves must safeguard their rights, and they themselves wash others. Of course, I have more fans than you, and I can only wash your manuscripts when I can afford you. This rogue logic has appeared several times before.

So what is the second one, don’t demand others with your own standards, let alone demand others with standards you can’t do, and respect the different choices of different people.

There are also some double tags. For example, my speech on Weibo will be larger, and the public account will be relatively convergent, and then the knowledge planet will be very convergent. I do n’t even allow others to forward and discuss the content of my public account. To the planet. On different platforms, my speech standards are different.

Why is this so? I also explained on the planet that Weibo was banned, it doesn’t matter, it doesn’t matter what you see. If the public number is blocked, although it will affect income, honestly, I can eat without it. However, whether it is Weibo or public account, they are all under the control of Internet giants. The giants have relatively strong anti-risk capabilities. If there is a problem, they will only bomb my account, but the giant will not die for me. The knowledge planet is different. If something goes wrong in the knowledge planet, the platform will really die.

Do it yourself, take care of yourself, and try not to affect others.

This is the third one. Emphasize empathy, understand the pain and struggles of others. There are many things that cannot be considered only by yourself. I smash my own rice bowl, I bear it myself, I smash other people’s rice bowl, this is not suitable.

Empathy can make people social. The workplace is getting wider and wider. Many people do n’t understand this principle, they will turn friends into enemies. Understand this principle, and often the enemy will become friends.

It used to be said that you are stricter with yourself and more generous with others. This is also a double standard. I don’t emphasize it, but being more empathetic, understanding different scenarios, different choices in different environments, and respecting different standards for different people’s decision making is actually a value of a harmonious society.

Finally, there was news that Sun Yang was suspended for eight years. I was also surprised at the result.

Whether this is fair to Sun Yang, what is the truth, I do n’t comment, why not comment, because I do n’t know the truth, and I ’m not a professional in sports arbitration, so it ’s not who I support or who I oppose, yes This incident itself, I do not take a stand, this is the premise.

But what I want to comment on is the domestic media. This is what I emphasized in my old article “Open Your Eyes to the World”. The various domestic media and self-media have consistently reported that we have the upper hand. Constant refutation to make the other side dumb, seems to have been a surefire victory.

This is selective reporting, selective interpretation, only listing what everyone likes to see, which makes our understanding of the world more and more distorted, and thus loses judgment on the development of various trends, and also loses judgment. There is a lack of ability to cope with it. Too many of us are immersed in our favorite viewpoints and positions. We dare not face facts, or even prejudge adverse facts, let alone how to plan responses.

From the chaos in Hong Kong, to the Taiwan elections, to Sun Yang arbitration, all kinds of phenomena are hitting the domestic media. Let us know that the world has not advanced according to their scripts, but we are just making excuses, others are wrong Yes, they are all bad. The question is, do you find an excuse to solve the problem?

Some time ago, some readers said that they would face me in the old article. The article about Singapore is a big one. Congratulations, it was deleted by reporting violations. Why face? Because in the media reports in the country some time ago, Singapore is finished, it has fallen, and it is incurable.

What about the facts.

The Singapore government’s approach is to tell you the worst possible situation and how to deal with the worst possible situation, so that the people can prepare in advance. But the government will try to avoid the worst possible situation and will make different strategies for different possibilities. In fact, Singapore’s approach is globally recognized.

But for us, everything is rendered in a good place. When faced by reality, we cover up and make excuses.

That’s it.

This article comes from public micro-channel number: caoz fudge (ID: caozsay) , author: caozsay