domeet webmaster

Our media, even those with a high degree of marketization, although they have relatively good professionalism, seem to have little positive interest in international public opinion and Western media, and they are not as good as ordinary netizens in China. High enthusiasm.

For example, in this epidemic, various media in our country have produced a variety of timelines to reflect the weak local government ’s initial anti-epidemic, which reflects the supervision and restoration of government work.

In the recent period, some western politicians and media have speculated that China should be responsible for the outbreak of the European and American epidemic. Even when China is required to compensate, I have not seen that the Chinese media have produced a large number of timelines to counter Western politicians and media. To prove that China ’s response has been fast enough to win the world a month or two.

Not to mention seeing these media go to Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and other international public opinion battlefields to publish a timeline. The only timeline is still officially released by our country.

Isn’t it important to counter the “China Responsibility Theory” of Western politicians and media? Obviously not, I am afraid that the hearts of many people in the country really feel that our country should be responsible for the epidemic, apologize, and compensate.

As far as the data is concerned, the country with the largest number of patients exported is Italy, and the country with the largest number of cases exported is the United States. The number of cases exported by China is far less than that of the United Kingdom where the think tank issued the “China compensation theory” noise. Why are these facts not promoted by domestic professional media?

Overall, the Chinese media countered the Western media, and the most pleasant time for me was when the Global Times published an “Australia, the” Paper Cat “surging around the South China Sea” in August 2016. Ironically, Australia is ” The “paper cat” has caused a strong response in Australia.

Almost all the mainstream Australian media quoted the content of this social review. Some of them were fierce in their attitude, saying that the Global Times “threatened” Australia. Some media even made a false accusation, claiming that the Global Times called for China to declare war on Australia.

They are always attacking China for various reasons, but they never expect to be counterattacked, but the word “paper cat” is very offensive, and it just hits the weakness of the superior Australians. They always It is a habitual judgment that satirizes and attacks China, and one reacts fiercely when counterattacked.

How much I was puzzled at that time was that the Australian side was all the mainstream media fighting against China. Why is there only one newspaper in China? Learn from the foreigners, come to the left and right, conservative extreme, rationalize the three-dimensional combat of various angles and how good it is.

In general, on the battlefield of international public opinion, only a few official media, foreign ministry spokespersons, Chinese embassies and other official forces are reluctant to fight back. This allows the Western media to start with a sentence of “Chinese official controlled media XX” or “Chinese official claim” to quickly hint to readers. Look, this is the official voice from authoritarian China.

Western countries, they are not only the media in combating foreign propaganda, especially the negative propaganda against China. And Western intellectuals are the same.

In the previous article, I sent Zhang Wei to participate in the Thinkers Forum organized by The Nexus Institute in the Netherlands. As you can see, when Western intellectuals discussed with Zhang Wei, they showed their treatment. What kind of attitude does China present. In the face of Zhang Weiwei, its founder directly said that China has no human rights. The rule is based on fear. It kills so many people every year, there are child laborers, etc., which is very aggressive.

Because of the difference between internal and external combat power, I think it is still a matter of constructing values. The values ​​of many people in our country only position themselves as critics of China, whether it is system, culture or other. Deep down, I still think that I am not as good as the West. The West is advanced, so it is not worth criticizing, or I am not qualified to criticize.

But you see Western media reports, no matter which Western media, they will criticize a person, a political party, a policy, a country, but they will never criticize their own path of democracy and freedom Not as good as China. On the contrary, each report reveals absolute confidence in its own path and system.

Have you seen the BBC, CNN, and the New York Times continue to report that the Western road is not as good as the Chinese socialist road, and is the Western democratic system not as good as the Chinese socialist system?

Western media news reports, you can often read more or less of their pride and superiority in their democratic and free system. I dare say that every Western reporter who faces China and Chinese people thinks that their systems and roads are better and better in their hearts.

It ’s not just a matter of system. Westerners also have a common racial psychology towards China.

Brands publicly put insulting China advertisements (remember D & G Du Gabbana), Swedish television broadcasts programs that discredited Chinese, rumored Xinjiang “concentration camps”, discredited China ’s oppression of Tibetans, accused China of being responsible Responsibility broke out in Europe and the United States, saying that China’s closure of the city has no human rights. In short, there is no psychological pressure on China’s various negative reports and accusations.

African American actors openly stated at the Academy Awards that the three Asian children were accountants because he knew that there would be no catastrophic consequences for doing so in a Western society where white people are the mainstream.

He even said, “If anyone does n’t like this joke, take your phone and leave a message on Twitter. By the way, your phone is probably made by these children.”

Their shared values ​​are very strong.

The values ​​of a normal Chinese and a normal Chinese media should be to safeguard China ’s interests and have a high degree of confidence in China ’s roads and China ’s national renaissance. You do n’t believe in yourself and ca n’t tell the Chinese story. It is necessary to exercise media supervision internally to promote reform and progress, and to dare to attack externally, defending China’s interests through various professional and authentic reports and Western media.

The times are different now, and we can no longer always make a promise to the outside world, and we must attack the inside.

It is somewhat gratifying that with the increase of national strength, young people in our country have clearly exceeded many in building the common values ​​of roads and national confidence.

In addition, changes in the external environment, especially the strong pressure from the United States, are also conducive to China ’s building of solidarity and carrying external pressure to realize the common values ​​of national rejuvenation.

The effects of these two opportunities have already been reflected in the domestic public opinion field, and will become more and more dominant over time. In the war of public opinion abroad, China has long been based on defense, blocking the penetration of Western propaganda.

After the common values ​​of the domestic public opinion field are gradually formed and gradually dominated, we will soon realize that defense and shrinkage cannot win the battle, and we must attack to win.