Author: North BB refers to the group Yu, editor: Po Where span> p>
p>
Has “China Jordan” lost? This problem is still unknown even on the April 2020 timeline. p>
p>
Because the Supreme People ’s Court has ruled in the final judgment announced on April 8 that China Jordan lost the lawsuit and needs to remove the corresponding trademarks and graphics, according to the “Jordan Sports” (that is, China Jordan) span> explained that the disputed trademark in this judgment is not the main trademark that Jordan Sports is using, but a combination trademark that has been registered by Jordan Sports for less than 5 years, and what is prohibited is only ” The supporting trademark of “Graphics + Text”, which has been used for many years, “Qiaodan”, “QIAODAN” and graphic trademarks, etc. have already won the lawsuit before and can continue to be used. p>
p>
That is to say, the rumored trademark of “holding a ping-pong racket” will still appear on sneakers and shop recruits. The so-called “clearly edged ball is finally over” in public opinion will still be a beautiful vision, constantly Appear in various business stories in the future. p>
p>
p>
p>
Of course, it is not surprising that “Chinese Jordan can be reversed”. Many media have reviewed a series of sophistical “arguments” of “Chinese Jordan” in court. Another part of the media said that “China’s Jordan intends to maintain the lawsuit for 8 years.” This can help them better “maintain public opinion.” p>
p>
In addition, the complexity of the case itself is far beyond the common sense of ordinary people. The Chinese netizens’ high probability of “Jordan wins the lawsuit” is a hot event that “turns out of the circle” and “facts” “It is not an absolute factor in the detonation of public opinion. p>
p>
But the labels of Jordan and Nike have climbed to the tip of the industrial pyramid and can be firmly bound by “China Jordan” and “Putian Shoes” for up to 8 years, which is enough to bring us beyond legal disputes. Imagination