If you can work with the master’s consciousness, you have already won 99% of the workforce.
Editor’s note: This article comes from the WeChat public account “LinkedIn” (ID: LinkedIn-China) , author Gray.
I just submitted a resignation application today, and I wanted to leave at the end of last year.
does not agree with the company ’s high-level ideas, and the work content is different from what was said during the interview.
The atmosphere of the company is not good either. Colleagues love to be careful, to blame, to instruct others, and leaders to publicly promote distorted values at the meeting (do n’t just focus on working hard, go to the leaders, shake them, and please .. . Etc.), the whole company likes to discuss the right and wrong of people from top to bottom …
Seniors and colleagues advised me that there are such people everywhere, and I need to learn to adapt …
I believe they say this out of good intentions, but I am still sad. I may not really adapt to such social rules, it is really unbearable, so I mentioned leaving.
This is a letter from the user of the second phase of “Linked Clinic”.
As a white man in the workplace, I was once educated by “experienced” senior colleagues to “get more leadership”; I also often feel that my personal philosophy is completely incompatible with the company’s top management; Fuck for a while, shake the pot.
After the development, it even caused me great discomfort. I felt uncomfortable from Monday to Monday. I didn’t know what I should do when I entered the office.
In the words of the well-known novel by Japanese writer Dazaizhi, I was “disqualified” in the workplace.
So, I left.
Do n’t like it, Sufficient enough to constitute the only reason for leaving
In fact, it ’s that simple. If you do n’t like it, it ’s enough to constitute the only reason for your departure. You do n’t need to find any other reason.
Early in the early career, our intuition is very important. Sometimes looking for a job is a bit like falling in love. If it does n’t feel right, it ’s not right. After that, you do n’t have to discuss the salary and career development. Follow your own intuitive choices.
As I grow older, I increasingly recognize the importance of how many things start in the beginning. If the initial opening method is not correct, then for a long time after that, you may all go to the wrong path.
I used to have a friend. When I first started working, I followed a leader who played with political skills in the company all day. He did n’t like it very much, but he thought it might be the case in the workplace.
In order to have a common discourse system with leaders, and to understand how the workplace should be mixed, he has read a lot of workplace novels and workplace dramas, and has learned a solid set of thick black learning. It’s all.
In his understanding, the workplace is to meet in the office every day, fight with various departments, and struggle with leadership. Either you die or I live.
But later, his path was getting narrower and narrower.
Leaders who played politics, the first wave was killed when the company ’s performance was not good. For him, because the past bad behavior left a very bad impression on colleagues, everyone gave him small shoes. In the end, the new leader had no choice but to kill him for small reasons.
He was killed by the company because of poor industry reputation, and he was in a great dilemma in finding a job. He didn’t find a suitable one when he searched for it. Finally, he could only cut his salary into a smaller company.
The classmates whom he used to laugh at have become heads of departments, and he is still a grassroots employee.
Talking to him a while ago, he regretted it very much. Say, If you left that company when you did n’t like it at first, and then look at a few more companies, you might think more broadly, maybe you wo n’t fall into the “mixed workplace” mode of thinking.
Frankly speaking, it is too late to realize that the essence of the workplace is “strive to develop oneself and achieve personal performance.”
So, in the early days of the workplace, if you do n’t like it, just leave.
But the only thing I want to remind is the objective reality factor. Do you speak directly, is life guaranteed? Do you have savings that do not require work and live for more than half a year? Does Social Security pay off?
If you think about these three items and analyze them rationally, then there is no problem in resolutely resigning to another job.
Do n’t form habitual dislikes because of emotional factors
The friend who asked the question, I do n’t know your age and working years. From the reasons summarized in the question, I think some reasons are indeed worth vomiting, but some reasons are obviously with emotional voicing, The truth may be worth scrutinizing.
For example, when you said “the whole company likes to talk about the right and wrong of people from top to bottom”, for example, you said “colleagues love to be careful, blame, and instruct others.”
Speaking of these two points, I believe most people will say with great sympathy: “Our company is the same!”
Why?
Because these points are common weaknesses of human nature:
Human nature is inherently gossip, so it is true that every company exists.
Human nature is inherently selfish, and selfishness is naturally accountable.
Human nature is also inherently afraid of responsibility, so it will naturally blame.
Human nature is also inert, so naturally it will be used to instruct others.
And, your words are “the whole company from top to bottom” or “colleagues”, is that true? Or is it a tendency to expand your assumptions because of your aversion to this company?
To be honest, these few problems that you vomit are not necessarily solved by changing other companies.
For example, you said, “The job content is different from what was said at the beginning of the interview.”
I do n’t really know how much the work content is written and the actual difference. However, if you join a startup or a company that is not that large, work content and the beginning The content of the agreement is not completely consistent, it is too normal.
Our workforce today is not a worker in the past, the job content can be
The friend who asked the question, I do n’t know your age and working years. From the reasons summarized in the question, I think some reasons are indeed worth vomiting, but some reasons are obviously with emotional voicing, The truth may be worth scrutinizing.
For example, when you said “the whole company likes to talk about the right and wrong of people from top to bottom”, for example, you said “colleagues love to be careful, blame, and instruct others.”
Speaking of these two points, I believe most people will say with great sympathy: “Our company is the same!”
Why?
Because these points are common weaknesses of human nature:
Human nature is inherently gossip, so it is true that every company exists.
Human nature is inherently selfish, and selfishness is naturally accountable.
Human nature is also inherently afraid of responsibility, so it will naturally blame.
Human nature is also inert, so naturally it will be used to instruct others.
And, your words are “the whole company from top to bottom” or “colleagues”, is that true? Or is it a tendency to expand your assumptions because of your aversion to this company?
To be honest, these few problems that you vomit are not necessarily solved by changing other companies.
For example, you said, “The job content is different from what was said at the beginning of the interview.”
I do n’t really know how much the work content is written and the actual difference. However, if you join a startup or a company that is not that large, work content and the beginning The content of the agreement is not completely consistent, it is too normal.
Our workforce today is not a worker in the past, the job content can be