● < U > the problem of social security payment on behalf has a long history. Social security is linked to the territory, registered residence and labor relations. These requirements will inevitably lead to difficulties in transferring and connecting social security relations, resulting in social security payment interruption. Only then can some people continue their social security relations through social security payment on behalf. < / u > < br > < div class = "height" > < / div > ● < U > after the implementation of the administrative supervision measures for social insurance funds, Social security payment service is clearly defined as social security fraud, and if the circumstances are serious, criminal responsibility may be investigated. Individuals who obtain the opportunity to participate in social security through “affiliation” not only violate the law, but also face multiple risks. < / u > < br > < div class = "height" > < / div > ● < U > the way to solve the chaos of social security payment on behalf is to peel off other social governance functions attached to social security on the one hand, and restore the system function of social security itself; On the other hand, the registered residence threshold for flexible employees or temporarily unemployed people to participate in social security will be abolished, which will open the door for them to participate in social security locally. < / u > < br > < div class = "height" > < / div > Liang Liang Liang, 35, is hesitating whether to transfer his social security from his friend’s company to flexible employees, or to find a job and directly transfer his social security to a new company< Br > < div class = "contoeight" > < / div > Liang Liang is a native of Hubei Province. After graduating from University, he worked in a state-owned enterprise in Beijing and obtained a Beijing hukou. In 2015, she chose to be a full-time mother in order to take care of her children, but she made difficulties in extending her social security payment record. After many inquiries, she transferred her social security to her friend’s company, and the other party paid her social security on behalf. She transferred her social security premium on time< Br > < div class = "contheight" > < / div > things have changed since April this year. Her friend told her that the state had issued new regulations, and the company could no longer pay social security for her, so she had to find her own way< Br > < div class = "contheight" > < / div > the new provisions are the measures for administrative supervision of social insurance funds (hereinafter referred to as the measures), which came into effect on March 18 this year. The Measures stipulate that an employing unit or individual is suspected of violating the law if it defraudes social insurance benefits by fabricating personal information and labor relations, or by fraud, forging evidentiary materials or other means< Br > < div class = "contoeight" > < / div > however, a recent investigation by reporters of rule of law daily found that, more than five months after the implementation of the measures, there are still many people like Liang Liang Liang who have no choice but to choose social security payment due to rigid demands, and some institutions still provide social security payment services to individuals without labor relations< Br > < div class = "contheight" > < / div > how should the social security payment service be characterized? What is the harm? And why are they so persistent despite repeated prohibitions< br>